From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 24 9: 3:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from web9303.mail.yahoo.com (web9303.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E415937B424 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:03:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from markgiglio@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010424160312.14367.qmail@web9303.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [61.12.197.6] by web9303.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:03:12 PDT Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:03:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Giglio Subject: hotmail converted from freeBSD To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi i heard this happened and one of their main business drivers was that "The cgi "one-process-per-socket" model, under FreeBSD, is very inefficient." I am interested in FreeBSD and how it compares to other systems like win2000, esp because I would like to build a big powerful super computer and am investigating options for my os. first of all, (please humbly pardon my ignorance) what does the comment re sockets mean. secondly, is this true about bsd. and thirdly, can it be improved, or is it a property of cgi and fixed? the source article is at http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/migration/hotmail/default.asp if it is not true, then surely there is no need to migrate to Win2000 at all .... Thanks for you time. Mark __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message