Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:37:16 +0200
From:      "Valentin Bud" <valentin.bud@gmail.com>
To:        "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Centralized DB of "system" users
Message-ID:  <139b44430812120437m732f7433od324109b3c9505aa@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730812120426t3c4b8a28q337c8379cd947702@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <139b44430812112348k5c51072ie771913c982f7cfe@mail.gmail.com> <49422A05.6050907@gmail.com> <ghtdp3$g0r$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081212120557.V3687@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <9bbcef730812120426t3c4b8a28q337c8379cd947702@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello list,

 Thank you everyone for your input. I now know what to look for. Gave it a
read at NIS in the
handbook but as you guys said it's FBSD only so because of the
interoperability i think i will go with
LDAP.

 I'll just have to check if (i suppose it does) that particular linux distro
"is ok" with using LDAP.

thanks once again and a great day,
v

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:

> 2008/12/12 Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>:
> >> I agree - NIS is easiest to setup, but LDAP is the right solution in
> >> this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
> >
> > why it is "right" solution?
>
> Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X.
> Besides, it scales well and has a large number of supporting
> utilities.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?139b44430812120437m732f7433od324109b3c9505aa>