From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 15:35:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690E816A418 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john_m_cooper@yahoo.com) Received: from web50704.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web50704.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A07213C4B8 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john_m_cooper@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 44881 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2007 15:35:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=z/zt814D8oUacFOC6JYpLZp+GiUQq92ziZiIVZfkexikp+aikqeelHmNcJD1BTB053bzaYfN3gKf4l5hnN+ZU5QQZ9ln4zv5k5ZsGSdAUWTPGHjc/ENu7zFS9MuQvIL6B4X98KYRzaOyOqVdM7WuQewwIE6ZZ6uPAsAA73Lme2c=; Received: from [134.121.240.131] by web50704.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:35:42 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.27 YahooMailWebService/0.7.157 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:35:42 -0800 (PST) From: John Merryweather Cooper To: obrien@freebsd.org, John Birrell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <543425.44000.qm@web50704.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Cc: ????????? Bill Hacker , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tinderbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:35:50 -0000 Could not -fno-strict-aliasing be considered as just another WARN level? At least then, there might be some pressure to eliminate strict aliasing warnings as a necessary component to moving to a higher WARN level. jmc ----- Original Message ---- From: David O'Brien To: John Birrell Cc: ????????? Bill Hacker ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 7:20:28 AM Subject: Re: Tinderbox On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:33:50PM +0000, John Birrell wrote: > Unfortunately the tinderboxes run with custom CFLAGS. > I would change this if I could, but I'm not the first to mention > how frustrating it is. I have never seen a good argument for why > the tinderbox is different from the CVS defaults. One reason is that some of us (at least) have dreams of not compiling with -strict-aliasing. If we have any hope of doing so - the tenderbox needs to build without to keep new warnings of creaping up. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"