From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jun 23 10:30:06 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA16122 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 10:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA16108; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 10:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 10:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199706231730.KAA16108@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: Brian Somers Subject: Re: bin/3885: /usr/bin/ppp -ddial sleeps forever instead of redial Reply-To: Brian Somers Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR bin/3885; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brian Somers To: stesin@gu.net Cc: Brian Somers , freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/3885: /usr/bin/ppp -ddial sleeps forever instead of redial Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 18:28:01 +0100 > > Dear Brian, > > I found what was the cause of my trouble. > > While configuring that site, I somewhat messed up and forgot > that LQR isn't working when enabled at FreeBSD ppp side. > I also hand-created another problem (it is mentioned > in the manpage), redial timeouts in ppp were interfering > with 'pulse-time XXX' cisco's interface command on other side. > > So strange enough, first connection went nice but redial wasn't > able to succeed. After all that headscratching, > two days ago I discovered that > there weren't 'disable lqr' and 'deny lqr' clauses in my config. > Adding them solved the problem. What was happening -- > ppp tried to establish a connection but went asleep despite > of getting packets back, because > it thought that LQRs should be coming already (?) > > 48 hours of continuous PPPing with reconnects (inspired > by wiretapping ;) went nice. So sorry for bothering you, > send-pr bin/3885 should be considered closed, and my _real_ claim > (as I understand now) was the fact that LQR was behaving odd. If you could send me some LQR logs showing the "oddness", I'd be *very* interested. I'm currently under the impression that there are no LQR problems :| - that's as of June 20. > I'll upgrade my personal workstation at work to 2.2-9706XX-RELENG > and redo the testing with cisco. If you want me to test > some specific setup via a nullmodem between 2.2-RELENG and > cisco 2511, IOS version 11.2(6+) -- I'll do this. > > Is the copy of PPP in http://www.freebsd.org/~brian the same > as in 2.2-RELENG? or does it have some additional fixes? Nope. The www.freebsd.org/~brian version is hacked so that it has its own libalias & libutil stuff - it should build on pretty much any version of FreeBSD. It's the same as RELENG_2_2 except for the Makefile & hacked libs. > Thanks a lot for your helpful attention! > No problem. > > Best regards, > Andrew Stesin > > nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE I'll close the pr, so the gnats cc isn't necessary in any replies. Cheers. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !