From owner-cvs-all  Sun Apr  8 15:48:32 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 81D2837B422; Sun,  8 Apr 2001 15:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org)
Received: from spike.unixfreak.org (spike [63.198.170.139])
	by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EC04A3E09; Sun,  8 Apr 2001 15:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>
Cc: mckusick@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ps ps.c 
In-Reply-To: <200104071101.f37B1ul55453@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from brian@Awfulhak.org on "Sat, 07 Apr 2001 12:01:56 +0100"
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 15:48:26 -0700
From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>
Message-Id: <20010408224827.EC04A3E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> writes:
> > So, the question is: do we want a `sess' column?
> 
> Personally I preferred it *with* the sess column (my change just 
> removed an irritating error message - I use ``ps j'' all the time and 
> have eventually gotten sick of seeing it).  Kirk, do you have any 
> objections to restoring sess ?

Well, to [hopefully] make it easier for everyone, I've produced two patches:

	http://www.unixfreak.org/~dima/home/ps-sess.diff
	http://www.unixfreak.org/~dima/home/ps-tsess.diff

The first one adds a ki_sess pointer to kinfo_proc.  The second one
adds ki_sess *and* ki_tsess pointers.  They represent the session
pointer and the tty session pointer, respectivley.

Anyone have any objections to these?  If not, anyone feel like
commiting them?

Thanks,

					Dima Dorfman
					dima@unixfreak.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message