From owner-cvs-all Wed Feb 27 9:39:25 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32ED37B41A; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:39:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17171E063; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:39:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA15746; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:39:07 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id JAA07197; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:39:06 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200202271739.JAA07197@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: julian@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/usb ohci.c uhci.c Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:39:06 -0800 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.3/makemail 2.9b Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > 2/ Recode loop to convince gcc that it does initialise a variable > (use do-while instead of for() so gcc knows that we always go through > at least once. Feel free to check my logic. This is why I hate -Werror. Coding for the compiler vs. for readability is always going to end up being a lose. Next year someone will come through here and say "Why isn't this a for() loop? That would make it much more reasable"... Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message