From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 11 09:51:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 8D162106566C; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:51:33 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Remko Lodder Message-ID: <20100911095133.GA98291@FreeBSD.org> References: <201009110907.o8B97h9o041593@repoman.freebsd.org> <2FE6FEAD-AEC7-47B3-BF09-7058908F3D42@elvandar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2FE6FEAD-AEC7-47B3-BF09-7058908F3D42@elvandar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/nvclock/files patch-src::Makefile.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:51:33 -0000 On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:33:20AM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > On Sep 11, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > > Closes PR: ports/149434 > > We refer to this as > > PR: / In most cases, yes, absolutely, but: The committed patch was not from the PR; submitter suggested marking the port as jobs-unsafe (and I hate marking ports unsafe or broken instead of properly fixing them). Technically, I could have omitted any attribution whatsoever, but decided to do it nonetheless (making clear that commit merely closes the PR, not taking any code/idea from it). Thanks for asking though. ./danfe