Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:14:49 -0600 From: Marc Wiz <marc@wiz.com> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: AMD vs Intel ... Message-ID: <20040210181449.GA57084@wiz.com> In-Reply-To: <BE4EE848-5BF2-11D8-889B-003065A70D30@shire.net> References: <20040209121420.G13061@ganymede.hub.org> <59D53984-5B26-11D8-8AE0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040209141200.K13061@ganymede.hub.org> <45C0AC64-5B31-11D8-8AE0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040210042518.GA53510@wiz.com> <4028CDA5.3010904@mac.com> <BE4EE848-5BF2-11D8-889B-003065A70D30@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:58:34AM -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2004, at 5:25 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > >Marc Wiz wrote: > >>On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 01:53:38PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote: > >>>OK. The price difference for AMD vs. Intel is pretty significant, > >>>but be aware that you'll also pay a significant premium for > >>>dual-proc hardware versus single-proc machines: compare an AMD > >>>2400MP versus the 2400XP price, or the 2.4GHz Xeon P4 vs. a > >>>Northwood P4, and then factor in the additional costs for a > >>>MP-capable motherboard. > >>Try about $159 for a dual processor motherboard from Tyan. > >>I just bought a S2466 for about that much brand new. > > > >You can get a decent single-proc AMD motherboard for about $55 > >(Shuttle AK39N w/ VIA KT400 + VT8235, onboard LAN and audio), which is > >one third the cost of your dual-proc MB, although obviously one can > >spend more on either type. > > > > Just a note: If you want ECC with an AMD Athlon (not AMD64), you need > to buy a dual board anyway, since I don't know of anyone who makes a > board with a chipset that supports ECC that isn't a dual. That's exactly why I bought that board. I already had ECC memory. Marc -- Marc Wiz marc@wiz.com Yes, that really is my last name.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040210181449.GA57084>