Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 12:53:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256243] graphics/libbpg: update to 0.9.8 Message-ID: <bug-256243-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256243 Bug ID: 256243 Summary: graphics/libbpg: update to 0.9.8 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: mazhe@alkumuna.eu Created attachment 225359 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D225359&action= =3Dedit Update to 0.9.8 Hi I'm the maintainer of the graphics/libbpg port, it has been brought to my attention that a newer version has been available for some time. Here is a patch to bring the port to the latest version. No major changes, = QA seems happy: /usr/ports/graphics/libbpg# portlint . looks fine. /usr/ports/graphics/libbpg# make check-plist =3D=3D=3D=3D> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) =3D=3D=3D> Parsing plist =3D=3D=3D> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist =3D=3D=3D> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR =3D=3D=3D> No pkg-plist issues found (check-plist) I've left the SDL viewer option by default, there's no recommandation yet to avoid things based on SDL1? Porting to SDL2 should be easy if upstream has = not done it in the meanwhile. Regards, --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-256243-7788>