From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 18:13:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1067016A406 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 18:13:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efinley@efinley.com) Received: from postmaster.etv.net (postmaster.etv.net [66.111.113.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACC013C489 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 18:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efinley@efinley.com) Received: from efinley04.etv.net ([74.214.237.51] helo=science3.efinley.com) by postmaster.etv.net with smtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HmZ7C-000AVf-9U; Fri, 11 May 2007 11:41:14 -0600 From: Elliot Finley To: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:41:13 -0600 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.1/32.1088 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:43:33 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS the perfect FS? if only... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:13:06 -0000 On Fri, 11 May 2007 00:09:52 +0200, you wrote: >Elliot Finley wrote: >> If you could start with a 3 drive zraid2 as the underlying pool >> storage and later add drives to the existing zraid2 as space was >> needed, then ZFS would be the ultimate FS (at least for me). >>=20 >> Any takers? How hard would this be? > >Isn't zraid2 like RAID6, e.g. includes 2 "parity" components? How do you >propose to redistribute the parity blocks after a disk is included in >already functioning RAID5 or RAID6 volume? > >(hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID5#RAID_5) The new 3Ware cards do Online Capacity expansion. So it's obviously not impossible.