From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 4 10: 8: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F74C37B400 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50C243E09 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:08:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com) Received: from localhost (eischen@localhost) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.3/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g64H81Eu011307; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:08:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:08:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen To: Julian Elischer Cc: Neal Fachan , Terry Lambert , Garrett Wollman , Jonathan Lemon , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: additional queue macro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > that was teh plan... we're just discussing the name.. > TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE ? Oh, I thought the initial proposal was to add a _new_ interface that allowed safe removals while traversing the list (and allow the existing macros to be changed for debugging purposes/extra sanity checks). -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message