From owner-cvs-sys  Fri Nov 15 00:52:56 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-sys
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA27783
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 00:52:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA27754;
          Fri, 15 Nov 1996 00:52:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id AAA13245; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 00:51:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611150851.AAA13245@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 locore.s 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Nov 1996 00:15:37 PST."
             <11301.848045737@time.cdrom.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 00:51:54 -0800
Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> >  Modified:    sys/i386/i386  locore.s
>> >  Log:
>> >  movl instruction should have been lea (this is why userconfig didn't
>> >  work in 2.1).
>> 
>> Erm, the movl looks OK to me, and the lea isn't an i386 instruction so
>> it doesn't compile.
>
>[scratches his head]
>
>Why did this compile for me?  And why did that single fix (suggested

   Bruce hasn't had his morning Wheaties or something. "lea" certainly is an
i386 instruction. I haven't looked at the code to see if it is *correct*,
however...but if it works I would say it is a good bet that it is.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project