From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 18 17:00:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA26391 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 18 Aug 1997 17:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA26325; Mon, 18 Aug 1997 17:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hwcn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA06764; Mon, 18 Aug 1997 19:59:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA14263; Mon, 18 Aug 1997 19:59:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 19:59:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca Reply-To: hoek@hwcn.org To: Satoshi Asami cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/4326 In-Reply-To: <199708182238.PAA02110@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 18 Aug 1997, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Close bogus PR, clearly submitter has old bsd.port.mk. (He would have > noticed that if he just took a customary look at the Makefile, it has > a ${SH} in there right before the scripts he's advocating chmod > +x'ing.) Would life be better if bsd.port.mk compared its last-mod time to that of the Makefile and printed a warning if the Makefile is newer than bsd.port.mk? -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk