Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 12:24:39 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns Message-ID: <3E665D07.9F8A2C15@mindspring.com> References: <20030305013509.AD7662A8BB@canning.wemm.org> <3E65E7A5.DBD9097A@mindspring.com> <20030305193621.GA37174@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote: > > Here is a single patch vs. 5.x. > > > > I believe this makes it actually work. > ^^^^^^^^^ > huh? This is untested? Will you accept interoperability between two FreeBSD boxes? A FreeBSD box and a NetBSD box? > > Please apply this to the code, even if you are intent on putting > > working code in the Attic. > > Why keep it? You've just proven that even one with a desire has trouble > determining if it works or not. No, I've just implied that I don't personally have the ability to put together an interoperability test bed that tests against non-FreeBSD boxes, without a lot of effort. Is FreeBSD/FreeBSD interoperability acceptable? It's like posting a driver for a SCSI card that was written from the specifications, without a card in hand. Except that his code is *already* in the tree, so it's not like I'm asking anyone to commit anything that doesn't at least make the status quo better. For heaven's sake! *It has only been 3 days* since the code was threatened! What do you expect *in 3 days*!?! -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E665D07.9F8A2C15>