From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 17 05:20:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A442106564A for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from ibctech.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0FC68FC0A for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 2477 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2009 05:20:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 17 Apr 2009 05:20:22 -0000 Message-ID: <49E81182.6090805@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:20:02 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "A. Wright" References: <49DBDE27.4010300@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions -" Subject: Re: Copying files without scp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:20:09 -0000 A. Wright wrote: > On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> Can someone recommend a *known good* production quality copy mechanism >> that will act like scp, but without the overhead? rsh? nc? > > If you are happy with rsh authentication, then have you looked at > plain old rcp? I reviewed carefully all feedback I received, and since then, I loosely benchmarked my options. After all was said and done, using SSH, I found: - across the 100Mbps infrastructure, I could copy at 89Mbps - across the Gi infrastructure, I could copy at ~770Mbps My concern (I found) was coming from my Windows workstation. I was using a Windows binary version of SCP that is clearly lacking somewhere in the stack. FBSD to FBSD produced the above results. The 100Mb infrastructure hops one router and two switches, and the gig makes a hop across one edge router, a core router, and three switches. When I can get 75-90% line rate encrypted, I'll stay with that. I do appreciate all the feedback, as always ;) Steve