From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 20 12:31:39 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8473C1065675;
	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:31:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net
	[IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD1A8FC17;
	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:31:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124])
	by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF243B941;
	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:31:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:06:06 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p17; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; )
References: <6882.1345325806@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <6882.1345325806@critter.freebsd.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201208200806.06990.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:31:38 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Matt Jacob <mjacob@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:31:39 -0000

On Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:36:46 pm Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <50300540.9060906@feral.com>, Matthew Jacob writes:
> >If you're going to talk about making a change to defaults, the default 
> >MAXPHYS and DLFTPHYS have been undersized for years now.
> 
> Indeed, but as I understand it, those require device driver changes ?

Scott already made the device driver changes for MAXPHYS and there are
various shops with run with a raised MAXPHYS already.

-- 
John Baldwin