Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:16:29 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, nectar@FreeBSD.org, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Rasmus Kaj <kaj@kth.se> Cc: announce@FreeBSD.org Subject: Removing net/arla (was: FreeBSD ports scheduled for removal) Message-ID: <20050110004629.GI88329@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <rqcis66ffh4.fsf@quetzalcoatlite.e.kth.se> <200501090624.j096OJMn018874@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20050109054144.GA37692@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050109054144.GA37692@xor.obsecurity.org> <200501090624.j096OJMn018874@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <rqcis66ffh4.fsf@quetzalcoatlite.e.kth.se> <20050109054144.GA37692@xor.obsecurity.org> <200501090624.j096OJMn018874@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20050109054144.GA37692@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3ZVRZSsi0599GS4V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday, 8 January 2005 at 21:41:44 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Dear FreeBSD users, > > The following ports are scheduled for removal over the next few > months, if they are still unbuildable at the scheduled removal time > and no PRs have been submitted to fix them. > ... > net/arla ports@FreeBSD.org 2005-02-18 There is in fact a PR against this port, but it's already out of date. I've sort of unofficially taken over arla, but I don't have time to look at it "at least for two weeks" (i.e. the foreseeable future). If other people want to do something here, don't feel inhibited, but it would be a good idea to talk about it. ISTR it was the recent changes in the bio interface that were the main issue. On Sunday, 9 January 2005 at 1:24:19 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:41:44 -0800, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> said: > >> net/arla ports@FreeBSD.org 2005-02-18 > > A newer version of Arla compiles and works (some to-be-released > patches required for AMD64), at least if you use Heimdal from ports. > (My environment is rather special so the work I've done is not > directly applicable to the port and fails package tests.) If you send me what you have, I'll test it here and commit it. On Sunday, 9 January 2005 at 22:40:55 +0100, Rasmus Kaj wrote: >>>>>> "GW" == Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> writes: > > GW> <<On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:41:44 -0800, Kris Kennaway > GW> <kris@obsecurity.org> said: > >>> net/arla ports@FreeBSD.org 2005-02-18 > > GW> A newer version of Arla compiles and works (some to-be-released > GW> patches required for AMD64), at least if you use Heimdal from ports. > GW> (My environment is rather special so the work I've done is not > GW> directly applicable to the port and fails package tests.) > > I'm willing to submit a new version of the Arla port, but I would very > much like to see ports/74113, heimdal upgrade from 0.6.1 to 0.6.3, be > commited first. nectar? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --3ZVRZSsi0599GS4V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB4dBlIubykFB6QiMRAlD/AKCxv1vVrGDXF88Hj6M4xYla6bOQUACfQj4/ mDlb9IMl8QF826BF7c5Bo44= =91vm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3ZVRZSsi0599GS4V--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050110004629.GI88329>