From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 26 20:22:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A0E16A5DD for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:22:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5956F43D60 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:22:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19B35E64; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:22:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45489-03; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:22:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04F05E16; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:22:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <426EA305.9010400@mac.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:22:29 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Fawcett References: <20050425010242.GA44110@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050425182033.GC40370@xor.obsecurity.org> <200504261338.01026.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200504261338.01026.andy@athame.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 [Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:22:51 -0000 Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Monday 25 April 2005 23:28, Garance A Drosihn wrote: [ ... ] >> I'm not saying that we should switch to it because of that, but I'm >> just mentioning it as an interesting data point (assuming it is true!). > > FYI, the KDE project just blacklisted gcc 4.0.0, because "it is known to > miscompile KDE. Please use a newer version, or if that is not yet available, > choose an older version." > > No, I don't know what the exact problems are, but they are obviously severe > enough for KDE to say "no thanks" to 4.0.0. Note that the KDE project also says "no thanks" to organizing their software correctly enough that portupgrade works.... -- -Chuck