From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 24 11:49:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E88E516A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8127F43D2F; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:49:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <200403241949400160004q13e>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:49:41 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA64059;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:52:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:52:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040324194600.GA8779@dragon.nuxi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403241151520.63489-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
cc: FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:49:43 -0000



On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:49:51PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > I don't quite understand why you need commitments for a toolchain
> > upgrade.  From what I understand, TLS support can't happen without
> > it, and by deferring the toolchain update you prevent it from
> > getting done.  But I'll play along regardless...
> 
> SMPng and KSE are both projects that haven't been completed because the
> project only had commitments for the 1st part of the work.  I refused to
> pushed to import new toolchain bits for the to sit dormant not being
> used.  I'd rather use my time working on another part of FreeBSD if the
> net of my time & effort is a NOP.


Ok David, so KSE is now completed to the point that the toolchain is
the bottleneck.. What's your beef?