From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 3 20:29:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA06788 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 3 May 1997 20:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au [129.78.129.109]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA06781 for ; Sat, 3 May 1997 20:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dawes@localhost) by rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.2) id NAA02754; Sun, 4 May 1997 13:29:26 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <19970504132926.21573@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> Date: Sun, 4 May 1997 13:29:26 +1000 From: David Dawes To: "David E. Cross" Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libXt References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69 In-Reply-To: ; from David E. Cross on Sat, May 03, 1997 at 11:44:41AM -0400 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, May 03, 1997 at 11:44:41AM -0400, David E. Cross wrote: >Just curious if the libXt delivered with XFree86 3.2 has already been >patched against the libXt bugs? A few fixes made it into 3.2, but not all of them. However, the libXt in the 3.2A beta is based on R6.3 and thus has all the fixes. David