From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 9 13:40:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA27066 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 13:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from jhome.DIALix.COM (root@jhome.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.69]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA27050 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 13:40:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.DIALix.oz.au (peter@localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1]) by jhome.DIALix.COM (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA03040; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 05:40:36 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: <199603092140.FAA03040@jhome.DIALix.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: jhome.DIALix.COM: Host peter@localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Terry Lambert cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When is 2.2 Estimated to be released? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 09 Mar 1996 13:53:57 MST." <199603092053.NAA21373@phaeton.artisoft.com> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 05:40:35 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk [...] >> An interesting point: If the -stable branch was not consuming the amount >> of maintainence time that it has been, we'd most likely _have_ 4.4Lite-2 >> and PCMCIA integration, as well as a greatly debugged vm, vfs and kernel. > >Yes; I agree that splitting the maintenance from the developement is >needed. Having people like John, and David, et al spending time >back-porting is a waste of their talents. Just out of interest, a diff -c between the most recent releases and branches (after stripping $Id$ changes etc) is about this: 2.0.5R -> 2.1.0R = about 10MB 2.1.0R -> 2.1-stable = about 6MB 2.1-stable -> 2.2-current = about 17MB. The difference from -stable to -current is heading towards being twice the size of the 2.0.5R -> 2.1.0R changes. It should comfortably hit 20MB once good chunks of 4.4Lite2 goes in.. (in case anybody is wondering how to strip $Id$ changes with CVS, use the -kk flag, eg: "cvs -q diff -kk -rRELENG_2_1_0") > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org Cheers, -Peter