From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 12 16:09:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA11753 for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 May 1997 16:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA11744 for ; Mon, 12 May 1997 16:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) id QAA22656; Mon, 12 May 1997 16:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 16:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199705122308.QAA22656@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: michaelh@cet.co.jp, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <3493.863438208@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: RELENG_2_2 From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > 1) Add mail to /etc/group so mtree can update /var/mail. * * Yeah, that was my change. Unfortunately, I couldn't think of any but Did we all agree that this was the way to go? My observation seems to be that the majority opinion was not to use group (mail)-writable /var/mail.... * > 2) The shared lib libutil is bumped to a new version. * * I thought Satoshi yelled about this - resolution? Quick guys?! :) My comment was on the -current version. libutils in RELENG_2_2 acquired new functions so bumping the number on that branch was correct. If I don't hear from Bruce or David(n) soon, I'll back it out myself. Satoshi