From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jun 12 00:45:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FFC32801E for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=m06Y=7Z=boxsci.com=warren@porkbun.com) Received: from fwd1.porkbun.com (fwd1.porkbun.com [52.10.174.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.porkbun.com", Issuer "Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49jhpw556Jz4fgT for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=m06Y=7Z=boxsci.com=warren@porkbun.com) Received: by fwd1.porkbun.com (Postfix, from userid 497) id EFFD041DEF; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:45:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.3 (2019-12-06) on ip-172-31-37-14.us-west-2.compute.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.3 Received: from [172.21.88.29] (unknown [154.213.3.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: warren@boxsci.com) by fwd1.porkbun.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DC7441550 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: freebsd vs. netbsd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <171506d5-19aa-359e-c21d-f07257c52ebd@freenetMail.de> <00225a04-237d-9051-9aea-12c192106a20@anatoli.ws> <373EDB20-C750-42E2-A41B-EA61F6E49807@kicp.uchicago.edu> <20200609120136.00005b3c@seibercom.net> <2393a1e0-b073-950a-78be-9f57d8e9934b@anatoli.ws> <20200610063555.00003707@seibercom.net> <82F57D0D-E0EC-49F7-824E-20A296C9F549@kicp.uchicago.edu> <250b853a-b436-0e99-b05c-9abd6b6019ef@panix.com> <20200611070630.2cb42786.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200611091449.383e1d83@archlinux> <53a6833e-db63-2395-4d2e-f05a9b1fb269@boxsci.com> <20200611112418.0bb0c896b685c84ed8d6a8f6@sohara.org> <20200611135639.0c07500e@archlinux> From: Warren Hua Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 08:45:36 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200611135639.0c07500e@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49jhpw556Jz4fgT X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=m06Y=7Z=boxsci.com=warren@porkbun.com designates 52.10.174.57 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=m06Y=7Z=boxsci.com=warren@porkbun.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.21 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:fwd1.porkbun.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.93)[-0.925]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[boxsci.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.45)[0.445]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[52.10.174.57:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.73)[-0.726]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[warren@boxsci.com,SRS0=m06Y=7Z=boxsci.com=warren@porkbun.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:52.10.0.0/15, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[warren@boxsci.com,SRS0=m06Y=7Z=boxsci.com=warren@porkbun.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:45:45 -0000 Ralf Mardorf via freebsd-questions wrote: > From my email addresses I'm using those addresses that do cause no or > less issues with a mailing list. This could change from one day to > another, not only related to DKIM. A few weeks back Zoho stopped > allowing to post to a mailing list, due to an unusual amount of > traffic. Actually it wasn't much traffic at all. Apart from this > it's not easy for me to get a new free as in beer address, since it > nowadays usually requires a mobile phone number, to get a verification > SMS. Other than Apple, PayPal, Online-Banks etc., free as in beer ISPs > don't send spoken SMS to landline. That's nice. I also had a old yahoo email (from 90s IMO), whose DMARC setting make me not comfortable. So I bought a domain and tried to setup my email server on freebsd. :) regards.