From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Mar 24 10: 2:58 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E692B37B917
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:02:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA14776;
	Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:02:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:02:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <200003241802.KAA14776@apollo.backplane.com>
To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>,
	FreeBSD-CURRENT Mailing List <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: INVARIANTS doesn't work?
References: <v04220808b5000473e2bd@[195.238.1.121]> <200003231745.JAA02103@apollo.backplane.com> <20000324094127.C1349@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

:Is there any good reason why we have two different options if they can
:only be used together?
:
:Greg

    I think it's so you can compile a kernel with INVARIANT_SUPPORT in
    in order to support dynamic load modules which may have been compiled
    with INVARIANTS.

						-Matt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message