Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:13:16 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DRAFT - DNS Admin Guide Message-ID: <3EF983CC.11367.3F0939E6@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030625140931.GA8427@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20030625081018.GC3446@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Jun 2003 at 10:09, Ken Smith wrote: > If the delegations currently in place are not hurting they would > not need to be broken down. But moving forward from here the "new" > focus on function (WWW/cvsup/ftp) being the primary organization > and the DNS layout not as focused on country codes is what decisions > get made by. > > Under this scheme all requests for updates go to dmsadm@ no matter > what thing(s) it is they are requesting. If delegation is in place > for it then the dnsadm@ folks handle bumping it to the right person(s) > (or if the mail volume on dnsadm@ isn't really all that high everyone > involved in any DNS changes can get the messages and would know which > piece they are handling). I may have a working example which will help. nz.freebsd.org is delgated to me. I look after DNS for everything under that subdomain. I've been doing this for the about 4 or 5 years I think. The only time I have to contact dsnadm@ is if I need to change the IP address on my DNS server. Apart from that, I do everything else. Granted, we have only one of www, cvsup, and [sometimes] ftp, but it is an example. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EF983CC.11367.3F0939E6>