From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 3 14: 5:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hecate.webcom.com (hecate.webcom.com [209.1.28.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6456F150D2 for ; Mon, 3 May 1999 14:05:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from graeme@echidna.com) Received: from kigal.webcom.com (kigal.webcom.com [209.1.28.57]) by hecate.webcom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA05293; Mon, 3 May 1999 15:03:00 -0700 Received: from [204.143.69.11] by inanna.webcom.com (WebCom SMTP 1.2.1) with SMTP id 27270121; Mon May 03 13:59 PDT 1999 Message-Id: <372E3926.4E15@echidna.com> Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 17:02:46 -0700 From: Graeme Tait Organization: Echidna X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Doug White , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: info@boatbooks.com Subject: Re: Current state of the conventional wisdom? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug White wrote: > > 1. As far as I can see, 3.1-Stable is the way to go. I need info on the > > best way to upgrade a 2.2.8 system to 3.1-Stable, going fully(?) elf in > > the process. > > I suggest holding off until 3.5. 3.X is a total mess at the moment, and > if your 2.2.8 box is running fine then don't touch it. When is that likely to be? I have a 2.2.7S/CAM server setup I'd like to upgrade to 3.X. I have a spare box, so a fresh installation is possible, but not if it'll just get me into trouble. -- Graeme Tait - Echidna To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message