From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 12 09:45:01 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA19396 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 09:45:01 -0700 Received: from toplink1.toplink.de (toplink1.toplink.de [194.163.120.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA19346 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 09:44:51 -0700 Received: (from ck@localhost) by toplink1.toplink.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id SAA01501 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 18:43:02 +0200 From: Christian Kratzer Message-Id: <199509121643.SAA01501@toplink1.toplink.de> Subject: INN Performance on 2.0R To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 18:43:01 +0200 (MET DST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1146 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hi Guys! We get a very low articles/sec rate on our UUCP news feed. I would be very interested in seeing some numbers of articles/sec rates from other similar news servers. Here's our config: - FreeBSD 2.0R - INN 1.4 - 800 mb /var/news on Conner CFP1080S 1gig SCSI drive - news and .overview are both on the /var/news partition although .overviews are separeted under /var/news/over.view - Adaptec 1542CF - 486DX4 32MB - uucp over tcpip feed using gzip -d rnews reports that it's getting between 2 and 3 articles/sec from the uucp feed. I have heard other people routinely get between 10 and 20 articels/sec. Something seems to be very wrong here but I can't seem to figure out what it is. We will be upgrading to a larger faster /var/news drive soon and will be separating the overview files to separate spindle but even with the current configuration I believe we should get at least 10 articles/sec using uucp. Any tips ? Greetings Christian -- TopLink GbR, Internet Services info@toplink.de Christian Kratzer http://www.toplink.de/ Phone: +49 7452 87174 Fax: +49 7452 87175 FreeBSD spoken here!