From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 21:04:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE2403A8 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C723A64F for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 439815B3BD23; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 13:04:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 13:04:51 -0800 From: David Benfell To: jd1008 Subject: Re: why would I get a segmentation fault on one system but not the other? Message-ID: <20150222210451.GA74450@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150221224006.GA5501@home.parts-unknown.org> <09da5ec0816e098badc49432c802dc18@sdf.org> <390c4c0547fc27e91d28872d29aa2e04@sdf.org> <20150222091956.fd1ec914.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150222104425.GA44573@home.parts-unknown.org> <54EA04D2.6090208@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54EA04D2.6090208@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:04:52 -0000 --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 09:33:22AM -0700, jd1008 wrote: > > > A crazy possibility - but thought I would mention it. > Is it possible you are having overheating problems, > fans not running well?... >=20 Actually, Valeri seemed to be arguing along a similar vein. So, from https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/your-laptop-temperature.39785/ vegan# kldload coretemp vegan# sysctl -a | grep temperature hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 27.8C hw.acpi.thermal.tz1.temperature: 29.8C dev.cpu.0.temperature: 27.0C dev.cpu.1.temperature: 27.0C dev.cpu.2.temperature: 28.0C dev.cpu.3.temperature: 28.0C dev.cpu.4.temperature: 25.0C dev.cpu.5.temperature: 25.0C dev.cpu.6.temperature: 24.0C dev.cpu.7.temperature: 23.0C vegan# uname -a FreeBSD vegan.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r279117: Sat Feb 21 15:57:40 PST 2015 root@vegan.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 This is actually significantly lower than the temperature it was running at for the memtest, where it ran from 45-50C, from what I saw in sporadic observations. (The photo at http://parts-unknown.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/0222150941.jpg shows 46C.) --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU6kRzAAoJEBV64x4SNmArlk4QAKDjNy1VP6ansFZZeEm2BhGe 8LaxdO/CuTQ6LnBnJC+mhNVB31zfPCQHtsdiImO2Es7/8HIpYgPBTR9cdvFBKeLL skS1r8L5HgRiYvWDHT9sV2HYMt4hwzuo/4z5slzpqM53lS03nbnJdMXEjiPsMV3w GqEDjk01sqIC9sZrUYjCcbT0rUcRe81io6DRPHPUJHwCxLQZ7/JK2mgrPA5P0ns6 ppql9+MVEwqOXE3wfcdH6V3plB4Wft0FfOmQ7HrZ0heoLP92EUNr6BDDUZ678NUE YpFNnuMS9gffHRPpPI4XnkXBboHNb5yLFN3Qsh6WXZFbyQCizi0KZi+h2HvuMc2a J2FwWaA+Icj6Xvn01tmG0KU49hG5CF232uKLJBpmJUM1FrznJjPhuX/1t9qgkzPp +9eTNqR0klQb6h2GdshEYZotlRTAxFw/5IyQX08ceogV875UaU7IF1GwQfaoam+3 K3Ce/rLf8pketU41OjqiVnfu41PLfhsXshj00rioBif89lbaxADKpRIo+mDiy0U7 ARYw0o22vRqBufaryLUJCBiiVBs6yPCOAURqWQIbWe0mPTsiR/I0rOrsWoXbTnfb MNN6ettFoV8WW/zkbaqaRMEe+XcEFucH0C2k7ZgbirB5w04H6//IRkxkkav+E5b0 wkE5y8rKxHpeQukgHw/R =hOYQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--