From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Apr 1 22:45:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F1337B6B6 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 22:44:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bandix@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA04324; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 01:43:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 01:43:43 -0500 (EST) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: erroneous messages filtering ((no subject)) In-Reply-To: <200004020607.BAA38557@dufus.video-collage.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> It's actually quite easy. The problem is that those kinds of filters >> are either so restrictive that they filter posts that they should not, >> or so loose as to not really be of much use. > >I'd come up with a filter to defeat this claim, but I'm afraid it will >not be employed anyway... > > -mi As far as I'm concerned there are better ways for the project to spend its time than catering to the demands of those too lazy to setup their own procmail filters. The original poster can filter his own mail. Brandon D. Valentine -- "...and as for hackers, we note that all of those known to The Register are so strapped financially that seizing their property would be tantamount to squeezing blood from a stone." -- The Register, 02/17/2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message