From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Sep 30 18:23:59 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA25202
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 30 Sep 1995 18:23:59 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA25197
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 30 Sep 1995 18:23:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA22009; Sat, 30 Sep 1995 18:23:40 -0700
To: dennis@etinc.com (dennis)
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 will require a minimum of 8MB for installation. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 1995 21:10:30 EDT."
             <199510010110.VAA06576@etinc.com> 
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 1995 18:23:40 -0700
Message-ID: <22006.812510620@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> >ONLY if we make it the largest issue.  I have no desire to do so
> >personally, and if you're really so fired up about it, well, you
> >have the source too! :-)
> >
> This is why there's Redhat, Debian, Slackware, etc....... Is FreeBSD going
> the same route as Linux???????

That's not what was meant.  What was meant was that Julian could
dive on the problem if he so wished.  I hardly expected him to go
roll JulianBSD because of it.. :-)

					Jordan