From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 16:13:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DCF37B401 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A98D43FB1 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:13:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D4F54861 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:13:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 505466D45F; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:13:22 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:13:22 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030804231322.GA11458@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org References: <200308040004.h7404VVL030671@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030804223511.GC11083@madman.celabo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030804223511.GC11083@madman.celabo.org> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 Subject: Re: IMPORTANT FOR lukemftpd USERS (was Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 23:13:24 -0000 On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 05:35:11PM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > I have a correction to make regarding the above text. In the case of > lukemftpd (and lukemftpd only), in some situations the vulnerability > may be used to execute code with _superuser privileges_. > > If lukemftpd is NOT invoked with `-r', then it does NOT completely > drop privileges when a user logs in. Thus, a successful exploit will > be able to regain superuser privileges. (By the way, it was Robert Watson who encouraged me to look at this a second time.) [...] > I would normally immediately publish a revised advisory with this > additional information, however lukemftpd is neither built nor > installed by default. Since that is the case, I will probably wait a > few days before revision in case further useful information comes to > light. Colin Percival pointed out that lukemftpd actually *did* ship with 4.7-RELEASE (!!), so I will be sending out a revision sooner rather than later. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se