From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 12 06:03:57 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F204106564A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:03:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.220.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E968FC19
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:03:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vcbfk1 with SMTP id fk1so1811999vcb.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:03:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=KFuxV+SJxUVBw5szVuy5d+3a0TvHOoh/8unXTYo+p9E=;
	b=XdX0S/VxrE2/G37E5P/IbdEL8Ikv7KAmpZRp9f0eWB55g58Yn+WoSyB7iD66tUmJNf
	uZOTZzfmTPgNJmk7KeqigZswyLX8tP2dWfG9A5o/fRj23DO6rZF955OqnaJJeQXpcB9T
	cYfoQTnEqGkz6zykdIZGu98656guxcsnDN/fo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.156.134 with SMTP id x6mr1359284vcw.17.1326348236027; Wed,
	11 Jan 2012 22:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.36.5 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:03:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAD+_bPxs7fc=n6HYTtNKwUXLu9kC8KL+i8P9XvTQbtddicKMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD+_bPxs7fc=n6HYTtNKwUXLu9kC8KL+i8P9XvTQbtddicKMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:03:56 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: KD9l1Yja08gGmi3JBvXyaVjX-hQ
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomkBjBEeoYPJktHmofBNA5Db=YBgVzLPRXUyuhXp9-z_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Gerald McNulty <gmnt99@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Assigning the PRIV_NETINET_BINDANY privilege required for
	setsockopt(IP_BINDANY)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:03:57 -0000

On 11 January 2012 15:26, Gerald McNulty <gmnt99@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using IP_BINDANY to facilitate transparent proxying works as specified.
> According the ip(4) man page and sys/netinet/ip_output.c, the
> PRIV_NETINET_BINDANY privilege is required in order to make a setsockopt()
> call with IP_BINDANY.
>
> I would like to use this in an app that does not run as uid 0. Is it
> possible to assign the PRIV_NETINET_BINDANY privilege to a specific uid or
> process or can this mechanism only be used in jails to reduce root
> privileges further?

I'm not sure if the relevant bits of MAC have been committed. Robert?


Adrian