From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Feb 28 13:29:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCC5CF06A6; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5EDA52; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from [172.20.3.207] (unknown [70.98.210.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DB853F5E3; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:29:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 05:29:47 -0800 (PST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Baptiste Daroussin cc: Roman Bogorodskiy , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r418285 - in head/sysutils: . uefi-edk2-bhyve uefi-edk2-bhyve-csm In-Reply-To: <20160807102703.mtekenorefwfsl2v@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Message-ID: References: <201607091610.u69GA8kt092183@repo.freebsd.org> <20160807102703.mtekenorefwfsl2v@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:29:51 -0000 On Sun, 7 Aug 2016, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> +USE_GCC= 4.8 >> Is that really stricly GCC 4.8, or would "GCC 4.8 or later" work? In >> the latter case, we'd write this as "USE_GCC=4.8+" (or "USE_GCC=yes" >> even). > I think the best for this one would be to mimic what is done in the > seabios ports (which would also drop the run dependency on gcc which > a I clearly think uefi things does not need :) Yes, but... :-) We got upstream GCC (and lang/gcc via a backport) fixed such that seabios now has a simple USE_GCC=yes. :-) Gerald