From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 5 20:30:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A8216A41F for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 20:30:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (storm.uk.FreeBSD.org [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070C643D46 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 20:30:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (uucp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j75KUQ2v054681; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:30:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (8.13.3/8.12.11/Submit) with UUCP id j75KUPFs054680; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:30:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from grunt.grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grunt.grondar.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j75KPWxw039554; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:25:33 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grunt.grondar.org) Message-Id: <200508052025.j75KPWxw039554@grunt.grondar.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: Message from Poul-Henning Kamp of "Fri, 05 Aug 2005 20:48:27 +0200." <21744.1123267707@phk.freebsd.dk> From: Mark Murray Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 21:25:32 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: putting HESIOD, Appletalk and IPX on notice X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 20:30:29 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > >I think it is time we deorbit HESIOD in toto. OK - please give it _plenty_ of time. >At the same time, making Appletalk and IPX "opt in" facilities by >putting them under > YES_IPX >and > YES_APPLETALK >boolean build options seems a sensible move. Cool. I think the standard is "WANT_FOO", but that is a detail. It may be an idea to make these default to "off" in releases, but keep them in HEAD until they become too painful to care about. That would probably handle the CYB factor the best. M -- Mark R V Murray What is the most interesting question you have asked? What, if any, was the answer?