From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 12:28:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B5B16A4CE for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:28:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9345C43D2F for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:28:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b138.otenet.gr [212.205.244.146]) iASCRkll000598; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:27:47 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iASCRfCR043142; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:27:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iASCRfct043141; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:27:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:27:41 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Jonathon McKitrick Message-ID: <20041128122741.GB43088@gothmog.gr> References: <20041127215612.GA86416@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20041128013135.GD662@gothmog.gr> <20041128044847.GA1435@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041128044847.GA1435@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is this a hole in my firewall? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:28:59 -0000 On 2004-11-28 04:48, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 03:31:35AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > : AFAIK, rule 00300 will never be hit by packets going out tun0 as long as > : you also have rule 00200 in there. > > Hmmm.... here's a run after having the laptop running for a bit. I don't > see why 200 doesn't cover the case either. > > root@neptune:~# ipfw show > 00100 0 0 check-state > 00200 6709 1277079 allow ip from me to any keep-state out xmit tun0 > 00300 2093 645797 allow ip from any to any keep-state out xmit tun0 Oops! That doesn't look good, unless I'm missing something about the way 'me' works. It's probably a good idea to send what you have so far to the freebsd-ipfw people.