From owner-freebsd-qa Mon Jul 10 9: 2:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB1837BE25; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:02:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.30 2000/06/08 18:25:35 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id JAA12491; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:02:06 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id JAA06312; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:02:05 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id MAA09516; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 12:02:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14697.62333.775276.719291@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:02:05 -0700 (MST) To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE In-Reply-To: <3969F221.34F78CE6@newsguy.com> References: <200007101408.KAA18231@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com> <3969EBAC.4DBE9FCF@newsguy.com> <14697.60996.49690.839290@hip186.ch.intel.com> <3969F221.34F78CE6@newsguy.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Tuesday, July 11, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: ] > > I had to chuckle here... :-) The issues 4.1 will have are whatever it is > that doesn't get enough testing! :-) HA! > We now have seen a HUGE merging effort. Fortunately, this is quite > different from the usual "I need to get this feature in there before > release!" effect that have plagued is before. But it still opens a lot > of room for problems. indeed. > And, then, I think we'll have no "CD candidates", as we had with 4.0, to > test the actual _cd_ distribution, which is something that often bite > us. > > I don't know. That was not my impression. But rather than spread > misinformation here, better just let Jordan speak. So, Jordan? :-) Hmmmmm. That indeed could "bite" us. I remember that the CD and N RC releases for 4.0 caught lots of stuff in the install process. Maybe that would be less now since we're not doing a ".0" release, but still--if it's possible to roll an ISO, I know I for one would download/burn/install/give-feedback. I sure others would too .... -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message