From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 30 17:25:47 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA08214 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 17:25:47 -0800 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (root@palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA08204 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 17:25:42 -0800 Received: from localhost (gary@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id CAA07596 ; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 02:18:14 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: palmer.demon.co.uk: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Steven G Kargl cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: symlink mode_t question In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 1995 16:39:15 -0800." <199503310039.QAA07349@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7592.796612692.1@palmer.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1995 02:18:13 +0100 Message-ID: <7593.796612693@palmer.demon.co.uk> From: Gary Palmer Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199503310039.QAA07349@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steven G Kargl writes: >Hackers, >I have a simply question about the mode given to a symlink when I >use `ls -l'. Why is it alway lrwxrwxr-x, and not resolved to the true >access permission of the file? It gets the symlink permissions from the directory (so it's not always 775...) Gary