From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 28 7:33:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B4C37B406 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:33:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB44D4B21; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:32:56 +0900 (JST) To: Anastasia Leventi-Peetz Cc: jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp, net@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: leventi's message of Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:27:24 +0200. <200108281427.f7SEROD01073@melle.fkie.fgan.de> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:32:56 +0900 Message-ID: <13704.999009176@itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >yes itojun, you are right with your remark, on the other side I don't >see by all available RFC's about tunneling IPv6 over IPv4, how >can somebody perform it, without such a Link Local Address! >(In this sense it is very relevant what JINMEI, Tatuya wrote) for configured tunnels, there's no relationship whatsoever between the link-local address on tunnelling interface, and the IPv4 address used to terminate the tunnel. jinmei's comment is totally unrelated to the topic, I would say. >I have read about such a tunnel success between FreeBSD and Linux, but >on the FreeBSD there was not the KAME stack. >Unfortunatelly I get no Info on the subject... now, what do you want to accomplish. this is still not clear to me. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message