From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 17 14:18:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4415AAD2 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E885E198B for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoaFu-00019k-3C for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:18:02 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r5HEJ3Hk094655 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:19:03 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id r5HEIwoY094652 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:18:58 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:18:57 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: "svn mv" and changing files at the same time: still prohibited Message-ID: <20130617141857.GA93727@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:18:12 -0000 Hi there, I've been trying to rename a port (games/rtcw -> games/linux-rtcw) and had to change something inside port's Makefile at the same time (drop PORTEPOCH and PORTREVISION, and set PKGNAMEPREFIX accordingly), but commit was blocked by pre-commit hook with "Do not replace a file. This can lose history." message. I was under impression that this is only true for CVS exporter, but since we no longer doing this, this hook should be removed. I've renamed and edited pkg-message file of that port just fine (in the previous revision), and all history is there, so I'm wondering what's so special about doing the same at the port-name level. ./danfe