From owner-freebsd-bluetooth@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 19:00:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA88716A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 19:00:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [204.107.90.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D01E43D1D for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 19:00:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuc@tucs-beachin-obx-house.com) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (ool-44c09852.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.152.82]) (authenticated bits=128)iB9J0s4J024119; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:00:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1])id iB9J0seW017444; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:00:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tuc@tucs-beachin-obx-house.com) Received: (from tucobx@localhost)iB9J0sfc017443; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:00:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tucobx) From: Tuc at Beach House Message-Id: <200412091900.iB9J0sfc017443@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: maksim.yevmenkin@savvis.net (Maksim Yevmenkin) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:00:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <41B89D1C.2050601@savvis.net> from "Maksim Yevmenkin" at Dec 09, 2004 10:44:44 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org cc: Tuc at Beach House Subject: Re: sdpcontrol issues (LONG) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Using Bluetooth in FreeBSD environments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 19:00:55 -0000 > yep, thanks. thats it. here is the response to your 'search opush' command. > > 1102617014.728752 > ACL data: handle 0x0029 flags 0x02 dlen 56 > L2CAP(d): cid 0x5c len 52 [psm 1] > SDP SSA Rsp: tid 0x0 len 0x2f > cnt 0x2c > srv rec #0 > aid 0x0000 (SrvRecHndl) > uint 0x10001 > aid 0x0001 (SrvClassIDList) > < uuid-16 0x1105 (OBEXObjPush) > > aid 0x0004 (ProtocolDescList) > < < uuid-16 0x0100 (L2CAP) > < > uuid-16 0x0003 (RFCOMM) uint 0x1 > < > uuid-16 0x0008 (OBEX) > > > > cont 00 > > i noticed that you also did 'browse' but you got nothing, right? > Right, but atleast it didn't input/output error. > > that's > normal, as long as you are not getting any errors from sdpcontrol(8). i > will commit a bit different patch (to libsdp(3)) that will work around > this problem. for now please undo all the changes to the sdpcontrol(8). > i will send you libsdp(3) patch to apply in separate email. > Great, thanks. > > sigh.. some smartphones are not so smart after all :( > I think they threw in BT to make people happy. There is known issues of items they TRIED to implement, didn't get to work, so put it out anyway. > > > One thing that has happened is after doing some of these I've had > > random full lockups of the Treo. > > i'd say this has nothing to do with this. all we are doing is opening > bluetooth connection and sending some data. this should not cause any > lockups on any side. if it does then i'd say its treo's fault. > Yea, just wondering if we are some how tickling an issue in their implementation. Thanks, Tuc