From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 22:16:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA8216A469 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 22:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB1713C4AA for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 22:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 48D4E1A4D89; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 14:16:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 14:16:10 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Ivan Voras Message-ID: <20071105221610.GF8950@elvis.mu.org> References: <472F31DF.4050507@travel2.com> <440b3e930711051021p778e34cfy714793dc5b7d328@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Objective-C kernel Development X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:16:24 -0000 * Ivan Voras [071105 14:11] wrote: > Ali Mashtizadeh wrote: > > More interesting choices are java or C# just because they are typesafe (e.g.: > > JX, singularity). I'm not sure why anyone would want to suffer with obj-c? > > When we're at it, why not Python? :) > > > > (I'd like to color it green...) > I think the gist of it is that the FreeBSD project will certainly consider bringing in runtime environments for just about anything, however entertaining the idea of it becoming an "official" extention and replacing or bringing in core-code that requires said runtime or language will most likely not be allowed until the tool is allowed to settle for some number of years. -- - Alfred Perlstein