Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Jul 2000 10:57:58 -0600
From:      Chuck Paterson <cp@bsdi.com>
Cc:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, David Greenman <dg@root.com>, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SMP progress (was: Stepping on Toes) 
Message-ID:  <200007051657.KAA14847@berserker.bsdi.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
}
}
}	I believe ipending wants to go away totally. It really
}isn't meaningful in the thread environment and the locked operations
}needed to support it once multiple processor are running
}in the kernel are more expensive the sti, cli.
}
}Chuck
}

	I should have said that it is the locked operations
needed to supports the masks is the really expensive part, not
ipending itself. Also with the spin locks we want to mask interrupts
to a particular processor not all processors. 


Chuck



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007051657.KAA14847>