From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Nov 9 11:47:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA00995 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 11:47:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from trojanhorse.ml.org (mdean.vip.best.com [206.86.94.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA00981 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 11:47:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamil@trojanhorse.ml.org) Received: from localhost (jamil@localhost) by trojanhorse.ml.org (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA01446; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 11:46:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 11:46:33 -0800 (PST) From: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" To: John Kelly cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Newest Pentium bug (fatal) In-Reply-To: <3466035d.2461408@smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk This is the same reason I trust the CYRIX 6x86, it is a damn hyperactive 486. In fact I held onto my 486-120 for quite some time, if they had only increased the cache and memory bandwidth on those things, keep the damn thing simple you intel bastards. On Sun, 9 Nov 1997, John Kelly wrote: > On Sun, 9 Nov 1997 03:08:14 -0600 (CST), Jim Bryant > wrote: > > >this is going to be a real nightmare for intel... how many pentiums > >are out there, and i'm begionning to notice a lot of pentium-specific > >stuff out there now. the instruction seqquence in question seems to > >me to be a type that will be in widespread use in the very near > >future. > > Now I'm really glad I bought a bunch of 486 processors and VLB > motherboards on closeout. :-) > > John > > >