From nobody Wed Nov 23 22:28:53 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NHbQN0Z4Xz4hGmg for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NHbQM0gZQz46WS for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cedro.info header.s=google header.b=DiN+u1H9; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tomek@cedro.info has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e) smtp.mailfrom=tomek@cedro.info; dmarc=none Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id s4so123429qtx.6 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:29:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cedro.info; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Au1OFSnS9xPDvsco+RPxliqE68SN8o+dHkSGXXQC1XI=; b=DiN+u1H97aqoKX6LCa/t/suusymNLJ0JrMNdTwtOjb/TrNthEh5S7yUU/6D059GtTq xadljnBgfF+gBEZxZrImH7D/fnEeKCFg2Z168pMk6+WuH0x6rzqGrQ0MLpJuCiBNe8x9 YGwla3wQtgRK8/LPuTowadvT6d076infmNxOFOJA12CjE/l2JGXbVEFBPe/SBUxjHLAD R79MH1+cj8dl7uIBYK8nBEO4yhUlQVvY6go8G5YojCCVfhiMN7KXwj3t1akjw3VdqHFo iCjFoRpqwDxHqpLCYlo/3QTqSgT026omu6pzDQRiqc+VIWDV5tBFP4Z6jmA14wKkRbiT P+5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Au1OFSnS9xPDvsco+RPxliqE68SN8o+dHkSGXXQC1XI=; b=JnKB2w/0hlYnvjoC+ItQNCqU2nCHn87BoeDcFDyIiKfzH6rXDqViodVcvb427nD/i/ Pw1K46crdbFex/Xd0ofpQlcHpFYA/+PY9CnAFwCQmhw0FLC5yeSOOMviYlffwJN8HWiu LU5dnEc7ZVp+SCxzG/VUqrShctmRZhrUhwxdhWVgnu3bRpZdDxdYKUSQlpw6NFCcv8jx OYYdNVl8OU1vn5B1U0Vo/MSrwtuNlHHixIpAT6vP3VHtm1CdQZCaE4XuYoHdn9ZWoupj QShc5HLIGJmw1gQ+MNRYdAUhPdrKB+noo3xTSUI7Aqb73Jf2s6M89e0J24oqBYDQDkWV /H6g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pl9kHhnt8eJHgqij9FX7tVAozkuBsieLNt1wQczN+vGyTABLcPy 3dHIU9xTEilXKRo5WAh+ybRV+Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5y4XrcHNYg3BQ/aqAEjK+4U5k0svCbCzUOIveHMftWcvLLwwiFriLy/3jRg0c6pwXKtC2S0w== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:480a:0:b0:3a4:ec00:abef with SMTP id g10-20020ac8480a000000b003a4ec00abefmr28724839qtq.483.1669242554202; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:29:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yw1-f174.google.com (mail-yw1-f174.google.com. [209.85.128.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bm3-20020a05620a198300b006f474e6a715sm12843902qkb.131.2022.11.23.14.29.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:29:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-3b48b139b46so3873687b3.12; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:29:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a81:4905:0:b0:3a8:fad9:13c0 with SMTP id w5-20020a814905000000b003a8fad913c0mr11227119ywa.23.1669242553082; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:29:13 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4e4baab2-d85b-a66f-53d7-62954ea4eb04@tsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <4e4baab2-d85b-a66f-53d7-62954ea4eb04@tsoft.com> From: Tomek CEDRO Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:28:53 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why do speedtest websites show much lower download speed in the Chromium browser? To: Yuri Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.28 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.981]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cedro.info:s=google]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cedro.info:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cedro.info]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NHbQM0gZQz46WS X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:56 PM Yuri wrote: > Something appears to be wrong with Chromium that it doesn't show the > real speed. FreeBSD octagon 13.1-STABLE FreeBSD 13.1-STABLE #0 stable/13-n253075-2b20cade1eca: Sun Nov 13 20:06:09 CET 2022 root@octagon:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 firewall_type="workstation" Firefox 107.0 Ping 6ms Jitter 2ms Download 913.3Mbps Upload 57.9Mbps Netprotect Warsaw UPC Chromium 107.0.5304.87 (Official Build) (64-bit) PING 6ms JITTER 1ms Download 938.3Mbps Upload 57.9Mbps Netprotect Warsaw UPC No big difference for me, Chromium seems even a bit faster o_O -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info