From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Sep 20 15:51: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.bluetail.com (mail.bluetail.com [195.149.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD16437B422; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from albatross.bluetail.com (albatross.bluetail.com [192.168.128.42]) by duva.bluetail.com (BLUETAIL Mail Robustifier 2.2.1) with ESMTP id 972699.490212.969duva-s1 ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:50:12 +0200 Received: (from seb@localhost) by albatross.bluetail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA71693; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:50:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from seb) To: Jimmy Olgeni Cc: , Ade Lovett , ruslan@shevchenko.kiev.ua, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: erlang patch References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Sebastian Strollo Date: 21 Sep 2000 00:50:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: Jimmy Olgeni's message of "Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:42:39 +0200 (CEST)" Message-ID: Lines: 29 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [I hope you don't mind that I widened the reply a bit, to inform other interested parties...] Jimmy Olgeni writes: > Hi Sebastian, > > Here is the patch. It should apply cleanly over the current port. ... Jimmy, Thank you very much for the patch, it seems to work fine, I suggest you submit it and also state that it superceed pr:s 20401 and 19659. [I said was working on a R7 port] > > Will the R7A be a separate port? It would be nice to keep R6A around > for some time to support older systems, if there are any potential > incompatibilities in R7. Well, I don't know. I guess if the demand is really big. But I really don't think we need to make R7 into a separate port - it shouldn't be backwards incompatible. Thanks for waiting! /Sebastian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message