From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 24 10:22:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from spirit.jaded.net (spirit.jaded.net [216.94.113.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF1F37B917 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:22:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@spirit.jaded.net) Received: (from dan@localhost) by spirit.jaded.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA00662; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:23:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:23:03 -0500 From: Dan Moschuk To: Doug Barton Cc: rjk191@psu.edu, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOUUCP knob and /etc/uucp Message-ID: <20000324132303.B603@spirit.jaded.net> References: <20000324105534.A1602@rjk191.rh.psu.edu> <38DBADCE.68B2D0B5@gorean.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <38DBADCE.68B2D0B5@gorean.org>; from Doug@gorean.org on Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 10:02:54AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG | > I was just noticing that the files in /etc/uucp are installed anyway | > if you set NOUUCP, whereas those in /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl are | > affected by their respective knobs. Could /etc/uucp be wrapped | > around the NOUUCP knob? | | I replied to Dan Moschuk's commit message for this with the additional | suggestion of including uucpd in src/libexec/Makefile too, but got no | response. I like the idea of wrapping the files in src/etc with the | NOUUCP (NO_UUCP maybe?) knob as well. Further research offers rmail in | src/bin/Makefile as a candidate as well. Oops! I've just committed the fix. It probably should be NO_UUCP, but no one seems to want to make a final decision on the NOFOO vs. NO_FOO argument, so I left it at NOUUCP for now. -- Dan Moschuk (TFreak!dan@freebsd.org) "Waste not fresh tears on old griefs." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message