From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 26 13:25:36 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5860106566C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:25:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net)
Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net
	[80.76.149.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF208FC16
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:25:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from c83-255-61-120.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.61.120]:24969
	helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net)
	by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68)
	(envelope-from <erikt@midgard.homeip.net>) id 1PAjVM-00052E-7v
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:23:58 +0200
Received: (qmail 55704 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 15:23:54 +0200
Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7)
	by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2010 15:23:54 +0200
Received: (qmail 79216 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Oct 2010 15:23:54 +0200
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:23:54 +0200
From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20101026132354.GA79188@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
References: <ia6jrk$8bb$1@dough.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ia6jrk$8bb$1@dough.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Originating-IP: 83.255.61.120
X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1PAjVM-00052E-7v.
X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1PAjVM-00052E-7v
	d86297ee7f559b273fca28ba82ed7711
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: rpcbind, rpc.statd memory footprint
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:25:37 -0000

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:08:06PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> I'm not sure what to expect from these (i.e. what is "normal" in this
> case?) but the VM sizes for the NFS-used rpc.statd and rpcbind here look
> a bit too big, compared to their resident sizes:
> 
>   778 root             1  44    0 26420K  3256K select  1   0:01  0.00%
> rpcbind
>   891 root             1  44    0   263M  1296K select  1   0:01  0.00%
> rpc.statd
> 
> This is 8-stable amd64. Could there be a memory leak somewhere,
> especially in rpc.statd?

FAQ:  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html#STATD-MEM-LEAK

(Short version: That is expected behaviour from rpc.statd)

-- 
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
ertr1013@student.uu.se