Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:05:35 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> To: kmacy@fsmware.com Cc: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system Message-ID: <1B5AEAC9-2A87-40F1-B2D4-2069DCBC30FE@orthanc.ca> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170605262035u4ac8f3jc0a022f335903522@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060527024407.GA2525@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4477C401.2080307@rogers.com> <38C8392F-C345-41F7-A879-6C2F5D2C59F5@orthanc.ca> <b1fa29170605262035u4ac8f3jc0a022f335903522@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 26, 2006, at 8:35 PM, Kip Macy wrote: > Irrelevant. The question is, as a percentage of FreeBSD users, how > many use fortran? A much larger percentage use perl and python, and > those are in ports. My gut feeling is that you just argued for moving the C compiler to ports, too :-(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1B5AEAC9-2A87-40F1-B2D4-2069DCBC30FE>