From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 2 06:25:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 815) id CCC8016A4CF; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 06:25:32 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 06:25:32 +0000 From: Murray Stokely To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20040802062532.GE19466@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200408020528.i725SDUt049376@freefall.freebsd.org> <200408020104.16008.linimon@lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408020104.16008.linimon@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/68595: [PATCH] add FAQ entry for lock order reversals X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 06:25:32 -0000 On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:04:16AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Monday 02 August 2004 12:28 am, Murray Stokely wrote: > > The submitter did not send in a glossary entry. It's true that we may > > want to add LOR to a glossary at some point, but as proved by the > > mailing list thread from which this submission was taken, this is in > > fact a frequently asked question. This is very appropriate for the > > troubleshooting section of the FAQ as is. > > Um, I definitely recall adding LOR to the glossary some weeks ago, > including a pointer to the collected LOR page. Great. My point was that this PR was about a FAQ entry, and it is appropriate whether or not we have a LOR entry in the glossary. - Murray