Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      20 May 1999 19:17:42 -0500
From:      Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org>
To:        Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
Cc:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Tommy Hallgren <thallgren@yahoo.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Lazy SPLs
Message-ID:  <86wvy3wa1l.fsf@detlev.UUCP>
In-Reply-To: Doug Rabson's message of "Thu, 20 May 1999 20:25:45 %2B0100 (BST)"
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905202024370.509-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> "Lazy SPLs - The kernel no longer masks hardware events unless a
>>> hardware event actually occurs, avoiding many expensive
>>> operations."
>> We've been doing it for as long as I can remember, at least as far
>> back as 2.0.5, probably as far back as 1.x.
> My earliest memory of it was as "Bruce's new interrupt code" for 386bsd.
> It was part of the 386bsd patchkit I think.

Why mask out the interrupts at all, instead of queuing them in handler
level?

joelh

-- 
Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org
   Fourth law of programming:
   Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86wvy3wa1l.fsf>